Pages

Tuesday 17 December 2013

Critical Issues To Be Politically And Legally Analyzed




The Nigerian Political Analyst

In the course of the actualization of our mission objectives, The Nigerian Political Analyst (www.facebook.com/nigerianpoliticalanalyst) shall carry out an in-depth surgical operation on the political situations in Anambra State most especially the last controversial gubernatorial election.

We shall uncover critical political issues in the Anambra State election and provide a meaningful social platform to deliberate on the current political issues in the country. Join us on www.facebook.com/nigerianpoliticalanalyst



Critical Issues To Be Politically And Legally Analyzed


(1) INEC requested Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige to pay =N=2,220,00:00  before he could be allowed to inspect and make copies of the electoral documents in the custody of INEC for the sole purpose of instituting and maintaining his petition before Anambra State election Tribunal.



Is the payment of =N=2,220,00:00 to INEC by Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige  to make certified true copies of electoral documents legal and not highly inflated cost to prevent Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige  from having access to documentary evidences to be tendered before the Anambra State Election Tribunal?

Click here to continue



(2) Before Honourable Justice J. K. Kaigama (a judge in the Anambra State Election Tribunal), Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige claimed that there were injections of false names in the Voters` Register of Anambra State used to conduct the last election.

Is allegation of injection of false names in Anambra State Voters` Register Confirmed by Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige before making such a destructive allegation most importantly where electoral materials are yet to be handed over to him by INEC?

(3)  Ugochukwu Ikegwuonu and Kenneth Moneken before Justice Ahmed Mohammed (Federal High Court, Abuja) claimed that Chief Willie Obiano submitted a voter`s card to INEC different from the voter`s card he submitted during primary election of APGA.

Is it not premature to accuse Chief Willie Obiano of Double Registration of Voter`s cards where INEC has not allege and drag him before a court of competent jurisdiction for prosecution?




For this and others, just a click

Reasons Why Chief Bode George Should Be Congratulated













Reasons Why
Chief Bode George
 Should Be Congratulated

Contents

Page 1 Of 4 ………………………………..Basic Facts Of The Case
Page 2 Of 4……………………………….Legal Meaning Of Discharged And Acquitted Verdict Of Chief Bode George
Page 3 Of 4……………………..The Call For Congratulations
Page 4 Of 4 ………………………………Advice And Conclusion



Page 1 of 4
Basic Facts Of The Case
            There are plausible reasons why Chief Bode George should be congratulated and celebrated in view of his uncommon heavenly favour from God, and unexpected void of contract splitting allegations leveled against him by The Economic and Financial Crime Commission.
          The pronouncement of Honourable Justice Afolabi Fabiyi (JSC) to the effect that the unsubstantiated contract splitting allegation leveled against him by the EFCC is not known to the Nigerian Laws has a lot of impacts in the political and social dignity of Chief Bode George.
           The prosecutor of The Economic and Financial Crime Commission failed woefully to demonstrate before the court how Chief Bode George had an intention to defraud the Nigerian Port Authority when the court said;
“I must state in clear terms that I fail to see how intention to defraud was proved as affirmed by the court below. In reality, it was not proved. It was not proved herein, the prosecution`s (EFCC) case must fail. It has been established that the case of the respondent (EFCC) rest on shifting sand.”

     As a result of the above among other cogent legal reasons adduced by The Apex Court Of The Land, Chief Bode George was discharged and acquitted of any wrong doing when the court said;
“And to cap it, the prosecution (EFCC) laced the extent charges with intention to defraud, an extra element of the charge which was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
The judgment of the lower court is accordingly set aside. The appellant (Chief Bode George) is hereby acquitted and discharged forthwith.”


Page 2 of 4
Legal Meaning of Discharged and Acquitted Verdict of Chief Bode George

                     It has been on record that on 26th of October, 2009, Honourble Justice Joseph Olubunmi Oyewole of the Lagos State High Court sent Chief Olabode George to Kirikiri Maximum Prison for 30 months for offences ranges from contract splitting, disobedience of lawful order and abuse of office among other things.
                        On 21st of January, 2011, Chief Olabode George appealed before Honourable Justice Clara Banta Ogunbiyi (JCA) of the Federal Court of Appeal, Lagos State Division, who upheld the decisions of Honourble Justice Joseph Olubunmi Oyewole of the Ikeja State High Court to the effect that Chief Olabode George and five others were guilty of contract splitting and awarding of contract beyond the approval limit.

                    On appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria, Chief Olabode George and five others were acquitted and discharged by Honourable Justice Afolabi Fabiyi (JSC) traceable to the gross inability of The Economic and Financial Crime Commission to demonstrate before the Apex court of the land how the accused persons intended to defraud the Nigerian Port Authority.

                   According to the black law dictionary, an acquit means; where a person accused of a crime is free by a court generally as a result of lack of evidence while discharge denotes opposite of charge; hence release; liberty; unburden; disencumber.
           
                 The legal interpretation of the terms discharge and acquit with respect to an accused person implies that the prosecutor failed to adduce evidence to warrant his conviction and subsequently, the accused person should be freed of all the unsubstantial allegation leveled against him.
             In one word, for the fact that the EFCC failed completely to adduce evidence of contract splitting, disobedience of lawful order and abuse of office allegations against Chief Olabode George before the Apex Court of the land,  Chief Olabode George should be set free, and be relief of all the unsubstantiated allegations.


Page 3 of 4
The Call For Congratulations
                    In the Nigerian laws, most especially the constitution of the country, an accused person is presumed innocent until found guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction.
                    Right of a person charged with a criminal offence to be presumed innocent until he is proved or has pleaded guilty (Presumption of Innocence) [Section 10(2)(a) & (11)(a) of the Constitution]

Reasons Why Nigerians Should Congratulate Chief Bode George
(1)  From the eyes of the laws, Chief Bode George is not an ex-convict.
(2) From the eyes of the laws, Chief Bode George has no criminal record in his life time.
(3) From the eyes of the laws, Chief Bode George is eligible to contest for any political post in the country.
(4) From the eyes of the laws, Chief Bode George is a man of dignity and sound moral status in the society.
(5) From the eyes of the laws, Chief Bode George deserves to be awarded a national honour because he had served his country meritoriously.


Page 4 of 4
Advice and Conclusion

It is our advice that Chief Bode George should appreciate Almighty God for his uncommon favour upon his life. He should not bother himself dragging the EFCC to court for character assassination and deformation of character. He should consider what has happen to him as being destined from heaven. He should not revenge. 

On behalf of the Management team of our organization, we congratulate Chief Bode George on his recent victory in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.







Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige May Not Have Access To Electoral Evidences To Prove His Case Before Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal


Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige
May Not Have Access To Electoral Evidences
To Prove His Case Before
Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal


                     Pieces of information at the disposal of our Electoral Correspondence showed clearly that there are strong indications to the fact that the All Progressive Congress gubernatorial candidate in Anambra State controversial gubernatorial election held on 16th, 17th and 30th of November, 2013, Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige, may not have access to electoral materials from INEC to prove his case before the Anambra State Gubernatorial Election Petition Tribunal before the expiration of 21 days ultimatum required to file petition.


                            Immediately after twenty-four (24) hours INEC declared Chief Willie Obiano as the winner of the controversial gubernatorial election on 1st of December, 2013, Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige filed a motion before the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal requesting for an order of the tribunal to compel INEC to allow him to inspect electoral materials used to conduct the election so as to enable him to institute and maintain a reliable petition before the expiration of twenty-one (21) days ultimatum recognized by electoral law.


                            Documentary evidence before our Electoral Correspondence showed clearly that the presiding judge in the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal, Honourable Justice Kaigama granted the motion of Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige on Friday, 6th of December, 2013, to the effect that INEC should allow him to have access to photocopies and other sensitive electoral materials used to conduct the controversial gubernatorial election.


                              As at today, 17th of December, 2013, INEC has not being able to comply with the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal rulings to make electoral material and other sensitive materials available for  Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige so as to institute and maintain a reliable petition before 22nd of December, 2013, the ultimatum date to file a petition as recognized by the Nigerian Election Laws.


                             Last week, INEC requested Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige to pay the sum of =N=2,220,00:00  before he could be allowed to inspect and make copies of the electoral documents in the custody of INEC for the sole purpose of instituting and maintaining his petition before Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal.


                              As at today, 17th of December, 2013, there is no evidence to show whether or not the sum of =N=2, 220,000:00 has been paid by Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige to INEC.

The concerns of The Nigerian Political Analyst are stated below.

(1) Is the payment of =N=2,220,00:00 to INEC by Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige  to make certified true copies of electoral documents legal and not highly inflated cost to prevent Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige  from having access to documentary evidences to be tendered before the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal?


(2) Can Senator Chris Nwabueze Ngige   file a reliable petition before the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal on or before 22nd of December, 2013, in realization of the fact that INEC is yet to hand-over electoral and other sensitive materials to him to inspect and for forensic experts’ observations?

On 16th of December, 2013, the secretary of the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal, Mrs.Deborah Musa acknowledged that the Anambra State Election Petition Tribunal has not receive any petition from any of the aggrieved gubernatorial candidate that participated in the last governorship election held on 16th, 17th and 30th of November, 2013 in Anambra State.